List of Flash News about valuation multiple
| Time | Details |
|---|---|
|
2026-01-05 17:04 |
Valuation Metric 4: EV/EBITDA — How Enterprise Value to EBITDA Guides Stock Trades and Crypto-Exposed Equities (BTC) in 2026
According to Compounding Quality, Valuation Metric 4 spotlights Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) as a core tool for comparing operating valuation across companies. Source: Compounding Quality (@QCompounding) on X, Jan 5, 2026. EV/EBITDA divides enterprise value by EBITDA to neutralize capital structure and non-cash charges, improving peer comparability for traders screening for relative value. Source: CFA Institute, Financial Reporting and Analysis curriculum. Traders typically benchmark a stock’s EV/EBITDA versus sector medians and its historical range to identify potential value opportunities or de-rating risk around earnings and guidance. Source: CFA Institute, Valuation Multiples guidance. For crypto-exposed equities such as listed Bitcoin miners and exchanges, EBITDA is commonly disclosed in earnings materials, enabling EV/EBITDA screens despite heavy depreciation from mining hardware and data centers. Source: Company investor relations and earnings releases from publicly listed miners and exchanges (e.g., Marathon Digital Holdings, Riot Platforms, Coinbase). Because the multiple rises when EBITDA falls (holding enterprise value constant), volatility in operating earnings can cause rapid shifts in EV/EBITDA, so traders often pair it with forward estimates and peer medians to avoid distortion. Source: Aswath Damodaran, Valuation and Multiples; CFA Institute, Equity Valuation. |
|
2025-12-06 13:02 |
Cicor vs Heico: Same Growth, Much Lower Multiple — 2025 Relative Value Insight for Traders
According to @QCompounding, Cicor is growing at roughly the same pace as Heico but trades at a far lower valuation multiple, highlighting a relative value setup for equity traders (source: @QCompounding on X, Dec 6, 2025). The post references a Cicor-sourced image to support the comparison, underscoring a valuation gap despite similar growth trajectories (source: @QCompounding on X, Dec 6, 2025; image source cited as Cicor). The source provides no specific multiples, growth rates, or any direct implications for crypto markets (source: @QCompounding on X, Dec 6, 2025). |
|
2025-09-03 12:04 |
Cicor vs Heico: Same Growth, Lower Valuation Multiple Signals Relative-Value Opportunity for Traders
According to @QCompounding, Cicor is growing at a similar pace to Heico but trades at a far lower valuation multiple, highlighting a relative-value setup for equity traders (source: @QCompounding). According to @QCompounding, Heico is one of the best-performing U.S. stocks, which makes Cicor’s discount versus comparable growth particularly notable for potential re-rating monitoring (source: @QCompounding). According to @QCompounding, the comparison is illustrated with materials sourced from Cicor, underscoring the valuation gap for investors focused on growth-adjusted multiples (source: @QCompounding; image source: Cicor). |
|
2025-09-03 04:55 |
BMNR vs MSTR: 1.08 vs 1.38 Multiple Shows Persistent Premium Gap Despite BTC vs ETH Rotation
According to @Andre_Dragosch, BitMine (BMNR) is trading at a relative multiple of 1.08 versus 1.38 for MicroStrategy (MSTR), highlighting a valuation gap between the two bitcoin-proxy equities. Source: @Andre_Dragosch (X, Sep 3, 2025). He adds this is despite a recent market rotation and BTC underperforming ETH, indicating MSTR still commands a higher relative premium than BMNR. Source: @Andre_Dragosch (X, Sep 3, 2025). |